Also the radioactive waste monsters (strobe flashing effect) was amazing fun. Maybe the first computer game I can remember beating, only after many hours of gameplay. I think I could spend hours telling you about my favorites, but here is a very condensed list:Ītari 800 - Miner 2049er - a platform game from the days before super mario.
My father brought home a computer from work, it was a Compaq Portable III - a 20 pound giant computer by today's standards, with an orange LCD screen. I recall the first time I got to play it. Randomness and luck definitely play their role in chess.Tetris is a great game. In reality when playing chess we have to choose between moves that we cannot calculate until the end, therefore we look towards "signs" that might indicate candidate moves and we add some ( pathetic ? lol ) calculation to that, if we are lucky we choose for the move that brings the best winning chances, if we are unlucky that game we go for the wrong one.īoth players have enough skill to avoid the worst moves but none of them can find systematically the best move, this results into a situation where the winner is the most lucky player, that is when both players are equally skilled, if this is not the case the more skilled player will be able to rule out the moves the less skilled player does not avoid, and the more skilled player has a better luck / skill ratio and has more probability to win. ( assuming both players are at the elo matching their skill ). The scores would then look like : within 100 elo range the games will always be remise ( I took 100 as an example not knowing the right number ) more elo difference would always result in a win for the highest ranked player. If it was the player with higher skill would never ever loose to a player with skill that is a fraction lower. Why does everybody think chess is 100 % skill based ?
0 kommentar(er)
